Skip to content
Thursday, October 15, 2026
Vardagsforum

Venezuela Is Poised to Shape President Trump's Legacy - and America's Position in the World

Following executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be getting into the state-building arena.

In a striking press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president stated that US forces had effectively seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a secure, orderly and judicious transition," he said.

What exactly "running the country" involves is uncertain, but the commitment signifies an sudden shift in direction for the president, full of contradictions and daunting challenges.

A leader who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now betting his administration on effectively revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently optimistic.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He promised to recruit American energy companies to repair Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing financing for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has reshaped Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump took office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is quite prepared to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

In contrast to past operations, which have mostly involved missiles and aircraft that minimize the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly different.

His aim, he said during his briefing, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be difficult for some of Trump's backers to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of abandoning his core supporters, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's perpetual military aggression and backing for overseas conflicts is justified because we are compelled to pay for it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and warranted".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard trade, land and assets that are fundamental to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will provoke broader concerns in global politics, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement expressing surprise and condemning what it said was a reckless attack on a independent country.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia after its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced concern about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were blunter.

"America should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders before launching the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" details of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with no American deaths and limited harm to US equipment. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most stunning, successful and impressive displays of American power and proficiency in US history."

Now he is gambling his presidency on that victory enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unclear. He and his team must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while calming a hemisphere that is bound to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

Written by

James Coleman

Elina är en svensk författare och livscoach med bakgrund i psykologi. Hon skriver om personlig utveckling, relationer och hur man skapar balans i vardagen.

Vardagsforum

Type to search articles.